Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

People v. Conners, B196516

Conviction and sentence for receiving stolen property and money laundering is affirmed in part and remanded where: 1) the evidence was sufficient to sustain the convictions; 2) defendant did not demonstrate that he did not knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel according to Faretta v. California; 3) the absence of a meaningful probation report and the court's refusal to continue the sentencing hearing required a remand for resentencing; and 4) the trial court erred in refusing to stay defendant's sentence for receiving stolen property under section 654.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 11/19/2008
  • Published 11/19/2008


  • COOPER, P.J.


  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellees:
  • Roberta Simon, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant., Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Susan D. Martynec and Robert S. Henry, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard