Conviction and sentence for receiving stolen property and money laundering is affirmed in part and remanded where: 1) the evidence was sufficient to sustain the convictions; 2) defendant did not demonstrate that he did not knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel according to Faretta v. California; 3) the absence of a meaningful probation report and the court's refusal to continue the sentencing hearing required a remand for resentencing; and 4) the trial court erred in refusing to stay defendant's sentence for receiving stolen property under section 654.