California Court of Appeal

In action alleging that defendant engaged in fraud, misrepresentation, and violations of federal and state securities law, denial of motion by defendant to vacate renewed judgment award in favor of plaintiffs is affirmed over claim that the trial court erred in denying defendant's motion to vacate the renewed judgment, which argued that the renewal improperly accorded plaintiffs compound postjudgment interest on a 2003 judgment.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/13/2008
• Published 11/13/2008

Judges

• MANELLA, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Mayer Brown LLP, Donald M. Falk, Neil M. Soltman, Fredrick S. Levin and Melissa J. Pastrana, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Appellant., Hennigan, Bennett & Dorman LLP, J. Michael Hennigan, Michael Swartz, Allison Chock, Los Angeles;  Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP, Irving H. Greines and Marc J. Poster, Los Angeles, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.