In a claim for harm suffered when plaintiff's finger became entangled in a glue spreading machine, summary judgment in favor of defendant is affirmed where: 1) defendant was a finance lessor, not a commercial lessor; 2) as the entity that merely provided the financing, defendant was outside the direct chain of distribution; 3) strict liability as a lessor was inapplicable; 4) if defendant was considered to be the seller of the machine, it sold a used product that it had no connection to other than having obtained bare legal title through the financing mechanism; and 5) defendant could not be held liable under either strict products liability or negligence theories.