California Court of Appeal
Harper v. 24 Hour Fitness, Inc., B189272
In a putative class action against defendant-24 Hour Fitness concerning the terms for the renewal period, order decertifying a limited class that had previously been recognized for their unfair competition claims under Business and Professions Code sections 17200 and 17500 is reversed and remanded where the trial court's decertification order was largely predicated on its erroneous legal assumptions concerning the scope of relief available in an individual action under sections 17200 and 17500.
Appellate Information
- Decided 10/22/2008
- Published 10/22/2008
Judges
- PERLUSS, P.J.
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Law Offices of Stephen Glick and Stephen Glick, Los Angeles; Daniels, Fine, Israel & Schonbuch, Paul R. Fine and Scott A. Brooks; Law Offices of Ian Herzog, Ian Herzog, Santa Monica, and Evan D. Marshall, for Plaintiffs and Appellants Bryan Harper and Mark Salzwedel.
- For Appellees:
- Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro, Susan Allison, Richard A. McDonald and Ryan S. Mauck, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent 24 Hour Fitness, Inc.