Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

California Court of Appeal


Defend Bayview Hunters Point Comm. v. City & County of San Francisco, A119061

Denial of plaintiff's petition for writ of mandate and complaint for injunctive and declaratory relief are affirmed where: 1) plaintiff's petition to force a citywide referendum on a local ordinance did not comply either technically or substantially with Elections Code section 9238; 2) section 9238 as construed by the trial court does not burden free speech; and 3) plaintiff failed to affirmatively show that a clerk committed error by providing plaintiff with a copy of the ordinance and certifying it as "a full, true and correct copy of the original on file".

Appellate Information

  • Decided 10/21/2008
  • Published 10/21/2008

Judges

  • MARGULIES, J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • The Grob Law Firm and Michael A. Grob, Sacramento;  Oregonians in Action Legal Center and Ross Day for Plaintiff and Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Dennis J. Herrera, City Attorney, Therese M. Stewart, Chief Deputy City Attorney, Jonathan Givner and Andrew Shen, Deputy City Attorneys for Defendants and Respondents.
Copied to clipboard