People v. Wilson, H030940
Conviction for sex-crime related charges is affirmed over claim that trial court erred when it instructed the jury with a modified version of CALCRIM No. 1191 and told the jury that it could use evidence of a charged offense to infer that defendant was disposed to or inclined to have the requisite specific intent for other charged crimes.
- Decided 09/12/2008
- Published 09/12/2008
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Steven Schorr, San Diego, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, San Diego, for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Edmund G. Brown Jr. Attorney General Dane R. Gillette Chief Assistant Attorney General Gerald A. Engler Senior Assistant Attorney General Laurence K. Sullivan Supervising Deputy Attorney General Seth K. Schalit Supervising Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent.