California Court of Appeal

In a franchise agreement dispute, determination of arbitration provision's validity is affirmed over claims that the court erred in: 1) ruling on the validity of the franchise agreement; 2) holding there was no meeting of the minds; 3) applying California law; and 4) holding that the arbitration provision was unconscionable.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/19/2008
• Published 09/10/2008

Judges

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Simas & Hutchison, Steven L. Simas, Scott M. Hutchison, Sacramento, and H. Jacob Chang, Roseville, for Defendants and Appellants., Hunt & Jeppson, Robert W. Hunt, Roseville, and Seth L. Hanson for Plaintiffs and Respondents.