David L. v. Superior Ct. of Orange County, G040284
Regarding juvenile court order setting a new permanent plan selection and implementation hearing, petition for writ of mandate and request for stay are denied where: 1) section 366.3, which provides for a new 366.26 hearing for children under the guardianship, does not require a modification petition; and 2) the prima facie evidence supported the juvenile court-s decision to set a 366.26 hearing.
- Decided 08/27/2008
- Published 08/27/2008
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Juvenile Defenders and Donna P. Chirco for Petitioner David L., Deborah A. Kwast, Public Defender, Frank Ospino, Assistant Public Defender, Geraldine Wong and Paul DeQuattro, Deputy Public Defenders, for Petitioner Tina L., Benjamin P. de Mayo, County Counsel, Karen L. Christensen and Aurelio Torre, Deputy County Counsel, for Real Party in Interest Orange County Social Services Agency., Rebecca N. Captain for Real Party in Interest Minor's Guardian., Law Office of Harold LaFlamme and April Kleis for Minor Child.