Gehr v. Baker Hughes Oil Field Operations, Inc., B201195
In an action seeking damages against former owners of a commercial property under a continuing nuisance theory, summary judgment in favor of defendants is affirmed where plaintiff's interest rate differential claim was indistinguishable from a diminution in value claim, which is barred, as a matter of law, by the statute of limitations.
- Decided 07/30/2008
- Published 07/30/2008
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Ezer & Williamson and Mitchell J. Ezer, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Keesal, Young & Logan, William H. Collier, Jr., Marc R. Greenberg, and Frances L. Keeler, Long Beach, for Defendants and Respondents.