California Court of Appeal

In an action seeking damages against former owners of a commercial property under a continuing nuisance theory, summary judgment in favor of defendants is affirmed where plaintiff's interest rate differential claim was indistinguishable from a diminution in value claim, which is barred, as a matter of law, by the statute of limitations.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/30/2008
• Published 07/30/2008

Judges

• SUZUKAWA, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Ezer & Williamson and Mitchell J. Ezer, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Keesal, Young & Logan, William H. Collier, Jr., Marc R. Greenberg, and Frances L. Keeler, Long Beach, for Defendants and Respondents.