In a case involving a procedural fairness inquiry by plaintiff expert witness brought to overturn his censure by a gatekeeper organization (AFTE) founded to promote the integrity of expert testimony, denial of plaintiff's writ of mandate to overturn censure is affirmed over claims of error that: 1) plaintiff was not afforded notice and opportunity to be heard by AFTE; 2) plaintiff's censure was contrary to California's litigation privilege; 3) judgment on the pleadings was not correct; and 4) AFTE's anti-SLAPP motion was frivolous.