California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

In re Rayna N., B206049

When the juvenile court fails to comply with the notice requirements applicable in Indian child custody proceedings, Welfare and Institution Code section 224.2(d) does not prohibit the established remedy of a limited reversal and remand.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/23/2008
  • Published 05/23/2008

Judges

  • WILLHITE, J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Los Angeles Dependency Lawyers, Inc., Law Office of Timothy Martella, Hermosa Beach, Ryan Matienzo and Eliot Lee Grossman, South Pasadena, for Petitioner., Raymond G. Fortner, Jr., County Counsel, James M. Owens, Assistant County Counsel, and Judith A. Luby, Principal Deputy County Counsel, for Real Party in Interest Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services., No appearance for Real Parties in Interest (Minors).

  • For Appellees:
  • No appearance for Respondent.
Copied to clipboard