California Court of Appeal
Santillan v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Fresno, B194219
In an action based on plaintiff's allegations of childhood sexual abuse by one of a Diocese's former clerics, summary judgment for defendant-Diocese on statute of limitations grounds is reversed and remanded where there were triable issues of fact concerning whether the defendant had the requisite notice that the offending cleric posed a risk of committing such acts as provided under Code of Civil Procedure section 340.1.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/21/2008
- Published 05/21/2008
Judges
- RUBIN, J.
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Arkin & Glovsky and Sharon J. Arkin, Pasadena; Kiesel, Boucher & Larson, Raymond P. Boucher, Patrick DeBlase, Beverly Hills, and Anthony M. DeMarco; The Drivon Law Firm, Lawrence Drivon and David Drivon, Stockton, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Stammer, McKnight, Barnum & Bailey, Carey H. Johnson, Fresno, and Aimee E. Rainwater, for Defendant and Respondent.