California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Moss v. County of Humboldt, A114205

In an appeal considering the appropriate level of review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for a subdivision project which was initially approved but subsequent delays caused its tentative map to expire, judgment denying landowner's petition for writ of mandate and requiring the preparation of a new environmental impact report is affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) the subdivision at issue was not a new project for purposes of CEQA; 2) supplemental environmental review was required based on new information about certain potentially significant impacts; but 3) substantial evidence supported some findings regarding these impacts, while not others.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/07/2008
  • Published 05/07/2008

Judges

  • McGUINESS, P.J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Harland Law Firm, Allison G. Jackson, Richard Smith, Eureka, for Plaintiff and Appellant in No. A114205 and Plaintiff and Respondent in No. A114622., Tamara C. Falor, County Counsel and Carolyn J. Ruth, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendants and Respondents in No. A114205 and Defendants and Appellants in No. A114622.
Copied to clipboard