Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

People v. Kelly, E042607

Following a remand wherein the trial court conducted a hearing to allow the prosecutor to state her reasons for exercising contested peremptory challenges, determined that the prosecutor's use of peremptory challenges were proper, and reinstated a judgment against the defendant for his criminal offenses, the ruling is affirmed over claims that: 1) the hearing was conducted in a manner so fundamentally unfair as to render it void; and 2) the recent decision in Snyder v. Louisiana (2008) implies support for all the procedural deficits existing at the hearing at issue.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 04/30/2008
  • Published 04/30/2008

Judges

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Stephen S. Buckley, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant., Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Pamela Ratner Sobeck, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, and Christopher P. Beesley, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard