California Court of Appeal

In an appeal involving allegations that a mobilehome park and a number of mobilehome dealers were involved in an illegal arrangement whereby prospective park tenants were forced to buy a mobilehome from one of the dealers in order to secure a space in the park, dismissal of the complaint is affirmed where plaintiff had not stated causes of action for violating the Cartwright Act, the Unfair Competition Law, or interference with prospective economic advantage.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/21/2008
• Published 04/21/2008

Judges

• ALDRICH, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Law Offices of William R. Ramsey and William R. Ramsey, Valencia, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• Law Office of Anthony C. Rodriguez and Anthony C. Rodriguez, Oakland, for Defendants and Respondents Norman Scott Liebert, Pacific Mobile III, L.P., Seals III, LLC, and the Liebert Corporation (“the Parklane Defendants”)., Klinedinst PC, G. Dale Britton, San Diego, John D. Klinedinst, Los Angeles, and Gregor A. Hensrude, Los Angeles;  Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone and Frederick R. Juckniess, Ann Arbor, MI, and Gregory L. Curtner, pro hac vice, for Defendants and Respondents San Jose Advantage Homes, Inc. and Glenn Gilliam., Law Offices of Samuel M. Huestis and Samuel M. Huestis, Ventura, for Defendants and Respondents Hermitage Mobile Homes Sales, Inc. and Joseph DeBoard., McGarrigle, Kenney & Zampiello, APC, Patrick C. McGarrigle and Philip A. Zampiello, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Respondents L.C. Manufactured Housing, Inc. and Neil Landes., Laughlin, Falbo, Levy & Moresi and Peter C. Flanderka, for Defendants and Respondents Macy Homes, Inc., Robert E. Durant and David Durant., Eric B. Kaminsky, Tustin, for Defendants and Respondents Maple Ridge Mobile Homes/CA, Inc. and Sam Silverman.