California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Costco Wholesale Co. v. Superior Court (Randall), B197692

In a proceeding where petitioner seeks nondisclosure of a letter, which was redacted by the trial court under the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine, petition for writ of mandate is denied where extraordinary relief is not warranted, as petitioner has not demonstrated how it will be irreparably harmed by the release of the letter as redacted.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/27/2008
  • Published 03/27/2008




  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellant:
  • Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Reed R. Kathrein, Berkeley, Lee M. Gordon, Elaine T. Byszewski, Los Angeles, and Steve W. Berman;  Rehwald Glasner & Chaleff, Lawrence Glasner, William Rehwald and Daniel Chaleff, Woodland Hills, for Plaintiffs and Real Parties in Interest.

  • For Appellees:
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Kenwood C. Youmans, David D. Kadue and Aaron R. Lubeley, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Petitioner., No appearance for Respondent.
Copied to clipboard