California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Ferraro v. Camarlinghi, H030890

In a controversy concerning a decedent's property distributions, an order striking plaintiff's complaint on several grounds of preclusion is reversed and remanded where: 1) trial court erred as none of the orders cited as bars to the action was shown to possess the characteristics necessary to give them preclusive effect against the plaintiff; 2) plaintiff's claims were asserted within the applicable limitations period; and 3) the compulsory cross-complaint rule does not apply to those claims.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/27/2008
  • Published 03/27/2008

Judges

  • RUSHING, P.J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Steven J. Andre, Attorney for Plaintiff and Appellant Sandra Ferraro.

  • For Appellees:
  • Michael G. Desmarais, Los Gatos, Attorney for Defendants and Respondents Susan Camarlinghi et al.
Copied to clipboard