California Court of Appeal

In an action seeking an order declaring California's Proposition 140 void in its entirety and an injunction enjoining its enforcement, grant of the Secretary of State's motion for judgment on the pleadings is affirmed where plaintiff's claim that Proposition 140 effects a revision to the California Constitution was already decided in the negative by the California Supreme Court.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/13/2008
• Published 03/13/2008

Judges

• COOPER, P.J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Kiesel Boucher Larson,Raymond P. Boucher and Michael Eyerly, Beverly Hills, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Christopher Krueger, Assistant Attorney General, Stephen Acquisto and Mark R. Beckington, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent Debra Bowen., Raymond G. Fortner, Jr., County Counsel, Judy W. Whitehurst, Principal Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Respondent Dean Logan.