California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Titan Elec. Corp. v. LA Unified Sch. Dist., B194748

Denial of electrical subcontractor's petitions for writ of administrative mandate challenging district's decisions, allowing prime contractor to substitute another electrical subcontractor for plaintiff, is affirmed where: 1) Public Contract Code section 4107(b) contemplates that the awarding authority's consent to substituting a listed subcontractor with a proposed replacement will occur before the prime contractor has the replacement perform work; and 2) however, a deviation from this chronology is permissible so long as the procedure used complies with the substance of the reasonable objectives of the statute.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 02/19/2008
  • Published 02/19/2008

Judges

  • WILLHITE, Acting P.J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Ross, Dixon & Bell, Kevin F. Kieffer and Lindsay J. Reese, San Diego, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Orback, Huff & Suarez, David M. Huff, Colin E. Barr, Los Angeles, and Marley S. Fox, for Defendant and Respondent Los Angeles Unified School District., John P. Carpenter for the Associated General Contractors of California as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent Los Angeles Unified School District., Carroll, Kelly, Trotter, Franzen & McKenna, Richard D. Carroll, David P. Pruett, Long Beach;  Benedon & Serlin, Gerald M. Serlin and Douglas G. Benedon, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent Kemp Bros. Construction, Inc.
Copied to clipboard