Baker v. Osborne Dev. Corp., E042006
Denial of motion to compel arbitration in a construction defect action is affirmed as the trial court correctly ruled that the arbitration agreement was both procedurally and substantively unconscionable, and therefore unenforceable.
- Decided 01/31/2008
- Published 01/31/2008
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellees:
- Gemmill Thornton & Baldridge, Bruce M. Thornton, Carlos V. Yguico, Los Angeles; Lincoln, Gustafson & Cercos, Teresa M. Beck and Lisa M. Mersereau, San Diego, for Defendant and Appellant., Lattie Malanga Libertino, Gerald Bennett Malanga, Teresa A. Libertino and Penny J. Manship for Plaintiffs and Respondents.