California Court of Appeal

In action alleging violations of the FEHA against employer and supervisor, summary judgment for defendants is reversed in part where: 1) there was a triable issue of material fact as to whether one year after the filing of the administrative complaint with the DFEH plaintiff continued to experience an adverse employment activity so as to defeat the statute of limitations defense; and 2) plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact as to her claims for race discrimination, harassment based on race, age discrimination, and retaliation, all in violation of FEHA.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/18/2008
• Published 01/18/2008

Judges

• MOSK, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Stephan A. Ebner and Kevin C. Boyle, Calabasas, for Plaintiff and Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Office of the County Counsel, Raymond J. Fortner, Jr., County Counsel, Ralph L. Rosato, Assistant County Counsel, Doraine F. Meyer, Principal Deputy County Counsel, and Donna B. Koch, Principal Deputy County Counsel, for Defendants and Respondents.