California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

People v. Gray, B192564

In a case where the trial court erred in modifying CALCRIM No. 316 (impeaching a witness with a prior felony conviction) to allow the jury to determine if the witness's felony conviction was one "involving moral turpitude," which the court defined as "involving dishonesty," conviction and sentence for residential burglary are affirmed where the instructional error was not prejudicial under the facts of this case.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/31/2007
  • Published 12/31/2007




  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellees:
  • Valerie G. Wass, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant., Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Michael R. Johnsen and Juliet H. Swoboda, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard