Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

People v. Abrams, B194835

Prison sentence imposed following revocation of probation on a charge of petty theft with prior convictions is affirmed as, whether or not a defendant has reported to his probation officer or made monetary payments to the officer are essentially non-testimonial; thus, even if hearsay, they are admissible at a probation violation hearing.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/21/2007
  • Published 12/21/2007


  • RUBIN, J.


  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellees:
  • California Appellate Project, Jonathan B. Steiner, Executive Director, and Ronnie Duberstein, Staff Attorney, for Defendant and Appellant., Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Keith H. Borjon and Sharlene A. Honnaka, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard