Foothill-De Anza Cmty. Coll. Dist. v. Emerich, H031120
In case involving passage by voters of a school bond proposition by a vote of 65.69 percent, trial court's validation of the measure is affirmed over claims that: 1) the proposition did not include the accountability requirements mandated by Proposition 39; 2) the voting scheme plaintiff used was unconstitutional as applied to one of defendants; and 3) the trial court erred in awarding costs to plaintiff in light of Code of Civil Procedure section 861.1.
- Decided 12/19/2007
- Published 12/19/2007
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellees:
- Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, Sean B. Absher, Joseph E. Pelochino, San Francisco, for Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant and Respondent Foothill-De Anza Community College District., Gary B. Wesley, Aaron L. Katz, for Defendants/Cross-Complainants and Appellants Melvin L. Emerich, Aaron L. Katz.