California Court of Appeal

Order of dependency court denying parents' section 388 petitions is affirmed as the court properly conducted a hearing on the petitions and determined parents did not show that changed circumstances or the best interests of the children warranted a modification of its order denying reunification services.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/11/2007
• Published 12/11/2007

Judges

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Jacquelyn E. Gentry, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Minor.


• For Appellees:
  
• Konrad S. Lee, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, Riverside, for Defendant and Appellant Mother., Nicole Williams, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Father., Ruth E. Stringer, County Counsel, and Danielle E. Wuchenich, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.