California Court of Appeal
Richardson-Tunnell v. School Ins. Program for Employees, B195938
In suit alleging invasion of privacy for defendants' actions in videotaping plaintiff at her wedding, at the wedding reception, and during her honeymoon in the course of investigating her worker's compensation claim, judgment on the pleadings for defendants is affirmed over claims that: 1) defendants waived governmental immunity by failing to plead it; 2) governmental immunity does not apply to the alleged conduct; and 3) Civil Code section 1708.8 provides an exception to governmental immunity.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/10/2007
- Published 12/10/2007
Judges
- COFFEE, J.
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Law Office of Daniel J. O'Neill and Daniel J. O'Neill, San Luis Obispo, for Plaintiff and Appellant Klare Richardson-Tunnell.
- For Appellees:
- Cumberland, Coates & Duenow, David M. Cumberland, Greg A. Coates, and Kevin R. Anderson, San Luis Obispo, for Defendants and Respondents Schools Insurance Program for Employees and Lucia Mar Unified School District.