California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Perrillo v. Picco & Presley, B182561

In action brought by plaintiff-psychologist against attorneys seeking payment for his services as an expert in a worker's compensation case and a civil suit, judgment for plaintiff is reversed as, since plaintiff's work was compensable through the workers' compensation system, he had no right to payment in the civil suit.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/06/2007
  • Published 12/06/2007


  • MALLANO, Acting P.J.


  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellant:
  • Cassinat Law Corporation, John E. Cassinat, Elk Grove;  Lopez, Hodes, Restaino, Milman & Skikos and Mark G. Crawford, San Francisco, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Breidenbach, Huchting & Hamblet, Eugene J. Egan, Los Angeles;  Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, Kent L. Richland, Laura Boudreau and Jeffrey E. Raskin, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Appellants Picco & Presley, Gregory Picco and Margaret Presley., Carroll, Kelly, Trotter, Franzen & McKenna, Richard D. Carroll and David P. Pruett, Long Beach, for Defendant and Appellant Joseph J. Iacopino.
Copied to clipboard