Schmidlin v. City of Palo Alto, H026841
In suit alleging police officers committed various constitutional and common-law torts when they detained and arrested plaintiff for public drunkenness, verdict for plaintiff on excessive force claim is affirmed as there was no reversible error.
- Decided 12/04/2007
- Published 12/04/2007
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Mark Martel, Palo Alto, for Plaintiff and Appellant Michael Schmidlin.
- For Appellees:
- Office of the City Attorney, Gary M. Baum, City Attorney, William B. Mayfield, Senior City Attorney, Donald A. Larkin, Assistant City Attorney, Attorneys for Defendants and Appellants, The City of Palo Alto et al.