California Court of Appeal

In case where a female employee began embezzling from employer-corporation while legally separated from her first husband, continued through her current marriage, and was ultimately convicted in a separate case, petition for writ of mandate challenging "Freeze and Seize Law" order favoring real parties former and current husband of employee is granted to give the trial court the opportunity to clarify whether its orders, which already distributed a substantial amount of the community interests to the corporation, will accord the corporation the full restitution to which it is entitled under the law.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/29/2007
• Published 11/29/2007

Judges

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Jones & Mayer, Fullerton, Harold W. Potter, and Michael R. Capizzi, Santa Ana, for Petitioner., No appearance for Real Party in Interest Azita Mahdavi-Cummings., Law Offices of David N. Thatcher & Associates and David N. Thatcher, Fullerton, for Real Party in Interest Reza Mahallaty., John R. Cummings, in pro. per.;   and Roger S. Shafer, Huntington Park, for Real Party in Interest John R. Cummings., Tony Rackauckas, District Attorney, and William Overtoom, Senior Deputy District Attorney, for Real Party in Interest People of the State of California.


• For Appellees:
  
• No appearance for Respondent.