California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

In re Dannenberg, H030031

In case where Board of Parole Hearings decided petitioner was suitable for parole, Governor's reversal of parole based on his conclusion that the gravity of the commitment offense alone justified an unsuitability finding is vacated as no evidence in the record that was before the Board supports a conclusion that, due solely to the nature of his commitment offense, petitioner currently poses an unreasonable risk of danger to society if released.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 11/16/2007
  • Published 11/16/2007

Judges

  • MIHARA, J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • John Ernest Dannenberg, San Quentin, CA, pro per.

  • For Appellees:
  • Pamela B. Hooley, Jessica Nicole Blonien, Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent.
Copied to clipboard