California Court of Appeal

In case involving successors in interest to the estate of their son seeking to annul respondent-board's order denying their son compensation for injuries he suffered when he was shot in the throat, respondent's order is annulled where the failure of the arbitrator to prepare a summary of evidence prevents the court from conducting a meaningful review of the respondent's order.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/18/2007
• Published 10/18/2007

Judges

• KLINE, P.J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Law Offices of Bryce C. Anderson, Bryce Clay Anderson, Brentwood, Law Offices of George W. Kilbourne, George W. Kilbourne, for Petitioners.


• For Appellees:
  
• Mullen & Filippi, Robert J. Cavallero, Oakland, for Respondent City of Lafayette., Hanna, Brophy, MacLean, McAleer & Jensen, Gregory Miller Stanfield, for Respondent City of Walnut Creek., Thomas, Lyding, Cartier & Gaus, LLP, Douglas E. Starns, Walnut Creek, for Respondent County of Contra Costa., Robert W. Daneri, Chief Counsel, Suzanne Ah-Tye, Asst. Chief Counsel, David M. Goi, Senior Appellate Counsel, for Respondent State Compensation Insurance Fund.