California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Venhaus v. Shultz, A116433

In an action raising a claim for negligent interference with prospective economic relations, judgment for defendant is reversed where the trial court prejudicially erred in the manner in which it modified a critical instruction.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 09/28/2007
  • Published 09/28/2007


  • POLLAK, J.


  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellant:
  • Charles G. Kinney, Oakland, CA, for plaintiff and appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • David S. Stromberg, Walnut Creek, CA, for defendant and respondent.
Copied to clipboard