Foothill Fed. Credit Union v. Superior Ct. (King), B198664
In action for invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress claiming that petitioner-credit union produced consumer records beyond the scope of a subpoena that had been narrowed, credit union's petition for writ of mandate challenging order overruling its demurrers is granted where the litigation privilege bars plaintiff's claims.
- Decided 09/24/2007
- Published 09/24/2007
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Anderson, McPharlin & Conners, Eric A. Schneider and Jason C. Ming, Los Angeles, for Petitioner., Law Offices of Peter L. Tripodes and Peter L. Tripodes, Pasadena, for Real Parties in Interest.