California Court of Appeal

While defendant's easement for equine use is accessory to use of his residential property, and the easement is valid, applicable zoning ordinances prohibit the keeping of horses on a lot not developed for residential use and, thus, the easement is unenforceable insofar as it would allow a use in violation of those ordinances.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/11/2007
• Published 09/11/2007

Judges

• EPSTEIN, P.J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• David Romley for Plaintiff and Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Edward D. Russell, Los Angeles, and Michael J. Gilligan for Defendant and Respondent.