California Court of Appeal
Totten v. Hill, A114467
In breach of contract dispute over a benefit plan participant's recovery of a medical malpractice settlement, summary judgment for defendant is vacated and the complaint is dismissed where: 1) plaintiff trustees had a federal ERISA claim for reimbursement over which the federal courts exercise exclusive subject matter jurisdiction; and 2) state courts not only lack concurrent jurisdiction over ERISA claims for reimbursement, but their jurisdiction over state law claims is displaced by ERISA.
Appellate Information
- Decided 08/13/2007
- Published 08/13/2007
Judges
- SIMONS, J.
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Stanton, Kay & Watson and Anne M. Bevington, San Francisco, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Halkides, Morgan & Kelley and John P. Kelley, Redding, for Defendant and Respondent.