California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Rowe v. Exline, A116463

Denial of motion to compel arbitration under a contractual provision for binding arbitration is reversed where that the trial court erred in deciding that individual defendants, who were not signatories to a contract containing an arbitration provision but were sued as alter egos of a corporate defendant that was a signatory, may not compel another signatory party to arbitrate the controversies raised in the complaint.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/31/2007
  • Published 07/31/2007




  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellees:
  • McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth, Timothy J. Buchanan, Fresno, for Defendants and Appellants., Mehlman TerBeek LLP, Timothy A. Walker, Walnut Creek, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard