In eminent domain action, jury verdict for defendant, denial of litigation expenses, and order granting set-off against interest due on judgment in the amount of rent owed to plaintiff are affirmed over claims that: 1) the trial court erroneously refused to permit defendant to litigate the propriety of the resolution of necessity pursuant to which the plaintiff condemned the property; 2) the trial court abused its discretion in denying defendant's motion for litigation expenses; and 3) the trial court improperly adopted the plaintiff's proposed final judgment of condemnation.