California Court of Appeal

Denial of petition for writ of mandate challenging administrative suspension by respondent of petitioner's driving privileges is affirmed over claims that: 1) there was insufficient admissible evidence introduced at the administrative hearing to establish he was driving at the relevant time; and 2) the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court's finding that he had refused to complete a chemical test after appropriate admonishment.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/27/2007
• Published 07/09/2007

Judges

• HUFFMAN, Acting P.J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• William D. Holman, San Diego, for Plaintiff and Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Bill Lockyer and Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorneys General, Jacob A. Appelsmith, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Chris A. Knudsen and Michael J. Early, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent.