California Court of Appeal

In case involving escape assessments, or assessments that are made where property in question was not assessed during initial assessment period, judgment for defendant-county is reversed as the controlling statutes require inclusion of all tax revenue, including escape assessments, in computing the tax increment.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/05/2007
• Published 07/05/2007

Judges

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Kane, Ballmer & Berkman, Murray O. Kane, Stephanie R. Scher, Los Angeles, Donald P. Johnson;  Gary L. Gillig, Oxnard, for Plaintiff and Appellant., Nordman Cormany Hair & Compton and Meghan B. Clark, Oxnard, for California State University Channel Islands Site Authority as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Noel A. Klebaum, County Counsel, and Lori A. Nemiroff, Assistant County Counsel, for Defendants and Respondents.