Order forbidding plaintiffs from recovering or introducing evidence of medical expenses beyond discounted rate paid by financial services company to medical providers is reversed as: 1) the intervention of a third party in purchasing a medical lien does not prevent a plaintiff from recovering the amounts billed by the medical provider for care and treatment, as long as the plaintiff legitimately incurs those expenses and remains liable for their payment; and 2) the jury can consider the amounts billed by the provider as evidence of the reasonable value of the services.