Benson v. Kwikset Corp., G030956
In suit for restitution and injunctive relief under the unfair competition law and the false advertising law, judgment for plaintiff enjoining defendants' use of inaccurate labels, and also ordering them to allow retailers and distributors to return mislabeled product for either a refund or replacement, is vacated and remanded in light of recent case law to consider whether plaintiff should be permitted to amend the complaint to plead facts satisfying the standing requirements under Proposition 64.
- Decided 06/29/2007
- Published 06/29/2007
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins, Pamela M. Parker, Kevin Green; Cuneo Gilbert & LaDuca, Jonathan W. Cuneo, Michael G. Lenett; Soltan and Associates and Venus, for Plaintiff and Appellant., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Richard M. Frank, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Herschel T. Elkins, Assistant Attorney General, Ronald A. Reiter and Benjamin G. Diehl, Deputy Attorneys General, for California Attorney General as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Jones, Bell, Abbott, Fleming & Fitzgerald, Michael J. Abbott, Fredrick A. Rafeedie and William M. Turner, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Appellants and for Amicus Curiae Leatherman Tool Group, Inc. on behalf of Defendants and Appellants.