California Court of Appeal

In suit alleging unfair competition, sustaining of demurrer is affirmed as to two defendants, but reversed as to two other defendants as plaintiff should be given the opportunity to amend the complaint to allege facts regarding the aiding and abetting of an illegal lottery.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/15/2007
• Published 06/15/2007

Judges

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Lakeshore Law Center and Jeffrey Wilens, Yorba Linda, for Plaintiff and Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Law Offices of Eric D. Morton and Eric D. Morton, Oceanside, for Defendant and Respondent Neovi Data Corporation., Kelly, Herlihy & Klein, Thomas M. Herlihy, Michael G. Glanzberg, San Francisco;  and Mukesh Advani, San Francisco, for Defendant and Respondent Ginix, Inc., Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Gail E. Lees, Los Angeles, Elizabeth A. Brem and Christopher Chorba, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent PaySystems, Inc., Cooley Godward, Michael G. Rhodes, San Diego, Lori R.E. Ploeger, San Francisco, and James R. Patterson for Defendant and Respondent PayPal, Inc.