California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Osumi v. Sutton, B191204

Orders granting respondent's motion to enforce the parties' settlement agreement, denying appellant's motion to enforce the same agreement, awarding respondent attorney fees and denying appellant's motion for reconsideration of those rulings, are affirmed over claim that the trial court lacked authority under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 to impose a new closing date for the real estate transaction, order alterations in the counteroffer, or award costs to respondent.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 06/12/2007
  • Published 06/12/2007


  • YEGAN, Acting P.J.


  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellant:
  • Law Offices of Ivan K. Stevenson, Ivan K. Stevenson, Rolling Hills Estates, for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Arnold Henry Lancaster, Ojai, for Respondent.
Copied to clipboard