California Court of Appeal

Conviction and sentence for robbery, with findings of prior strikes and other priors, are affirmed as: 1) no prejudicial errors were committed in the resolution of defendant's motions before and during trial related to his right to counsel; 2) the robbery statute is not vague; 3) no instructional error occurred; 4) the robbery convictions are all supported by the evidence, and 5) defendant's sentence did not violate any constitutional principles.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/29/2007
• Published 05/29/2007

Judges

• SWAGER, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Rodger Paul Curnow, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Catherine A. Rivlin, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Allen R. Crown, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.