California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

In re Smith, H030201

Order ending petitioner's parole on the ground that he had completed his parole requirements is affirmed over claims by the prosecution that the procedure by which the superior court issued its order was defective, and petitioner must remain on parole because he has not satisfied the time requirements of his parole term.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/02/2007
  • Published 05/02/2007


  • DUFFY, J.


  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellant:
  • Bill Lockyer and Edmund G. Brown, Jr. Attorneys General, James M. Humes, Robert R. Anderson, Mary Jo Graves and Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorneys General, Frances T. Grunder and Julie L. Garland, Senior Assistant Attorneys General, Anya M. Binsacca and Jennifer A. Neill, Supervising Deputy Attorneys General, Scott C. Mather, Deputy Attorney General, for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Picone & Defilippis, Steve M. DeFilippis, San Jose, for Respondent, (Under appointment by the Court of Appeal).
Copied to clipboard