InfiNet Mktg. Servs., Inc. v. Am. Motorist Ins. Co., G036312, G036248
In a coverage dispute between insurance broker and insurer over insurer's refusal to defend broker in underlying litigation related to a worker's compensation policy of an employee leasing company, summary judgment for insurer in one case is affirmed, and denial of summary judgment in another is vacated as the insurance broker is not a third party beneficiary of the insurance contract and the insurer had no duty to defend or indmenify the broker.
- Decided 04/25/2007
- Published 04/25/2007
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Steven W. Murray; Cates Peterson and Mark D. Peterson for Cross-complainant and Appellant and for Real Party in Interest.
- For Appellees:
- No appearance for Respondent., Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, Frederick Douglas Baker, Brian D. Harrison and Vanessa L. O'Brien, San Francisco, for Cross-defendant and Respondent and for Petitioner.