California Court of Appeal

Denial of motion to disqualify counsel for defendant is affirmed as plaintiff did not meet her initial burden of proving that another party, who had previously agreed to share what he knew about plaintiff's case with defendants pursuant to a settlement agreement, possessed any information that plaintiff could claim was confidential.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/25/2007
• Published 04/25/2007

Judges

• PREMO, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Carcione, Cattermole, Dolinski, Okimoto, Stucky, Ukshini, Markowitz, Carcione, Aaron B. Markowitz, Joshua S. Markowitz, Redwood City, for Plaintiff/Appellant Patricia Roush.


• For Appellees:
  
• Morrison & Foerster, Raymond L. Wheeler, David J. Murphy, Christine E. Lyon, Palo Alto, for Defendants/Respondents Seagate Technology and Kevin Scott.