California Court of Appeal
Castillo v. Pacheco, B188991
In suit alleging nuisance in the form of large ceremonial outdoor open fires being held in defendants' backyard, denial of anti-SLAPP motion seeking to strike complaint is affirmed as the anti-SLAPP statute does not provide a vehicle for early scrutiny of a cause of action against a person arising from an act of that person in furtherance of the person-s right of free exercise of religion.
Appellate Information
- Decided 04/25/2007
- Published 04/25/2007
Judges
- KLEIN, P.J.
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Bufete Juridico de/Law Offices of Guillermo SuarezM, Guillermo SuarezM, Los Angeles; Newman Aaronson Vanaman, Robert M. Myers, Sherman Oaks, Sharon Robinson; Law Offices of Carol A. Sobel and Carol A. Sobel for Defendants and Appellants., Pierce Law Group and F. Robert Nakahiro for Plaintiffs and Respondents.