Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Fladeboe v. American Isuzu Motors Inc., G036522

In suit alleging defendant unreasonably withheld consent to request by one of plaintiffs to transfer a car dealership, minute order making findings against plaintiffs followed by judgment for defendant and cross-complainant are affirmed under the doctrine of implied findings in that the trial court impliedly made every factual finding necessary to conclude that defendant did not unreasonably withhold consent to transfer the dealership, and there was no error in the jury-s award of damages or the trial court-s award of restitution on the cross-complaint.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 04/24/2007
  • Published 04/24/2007



  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellees:
  • David B. Dimitruk, Irvine, for Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Appellants., The Mulcahy Law Firm, James M. Mulcahy, Irvine, and Rex T. Reeves, Newport Beach, for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard