California Court of Appeal
Bd. of Trustees of Stanford Univ. v. Superior Ct. (Umana), H030451
In case where real party filed a pro se personal injury complaint exactly two years after his fall, but which was signed by his father and not by real party, petition for writ of mandate challenging leave to file amended complaint and denial of petitioner's motion for summary judgment is denied as the trial court did not err.
Appellate Information
- Decided 04/18/2007
- Published 04/18/2007
Judges
- BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, Acting P.J.
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- John M. Ingle, Law Offices of John M. Ingle, Nicole Noelle Hancock, Shea & Shea, San Jose, Attorneys for Plaintiff and Real Party in Interest.
- For Appellees:
- Robert von Raesfeld, John K. Haggerty, Law Offices of Robert von Raesfeld, Attorney for Defendant and Petitioner., No Appearance, Attorneys for Respondent.